NewQuantStudio
A research and trading workbench with a Jev-powered futures monitoring and proposal-evaluation path connected to a simulated contest account.
Added to Jevfast
NewHow it uses Jev
The host supplies a bounded proposal, dated market evidence, and a fresh account snapshot. Jev classifies evidence sufficiency, scores support on the source-defined four-step scale, and flags material risk or missing inputs. It does not itself submit orders.
What Jev decides
Representative source-derived requestExample answers · not a recorded Jev response · Source ↗
Question 1 · evidence
YOUR APP
INSTRUCTION
Are the supplied dated market observations sufficient to evaluate this proposal?
STATE
User-provided futures proposal and dated market evidence combined with a fresh account, positions and open orders snapshot. Each evaluation has observation timestamps.
JEV · CHOICE
- sufficient
- incomplete
- conflicting
Question 2 · support
YOUR APP
INSTRUCTION
How strongly does the supplied evidence support the proposed action under the stated constraints?
STATE
User-provided futures proposal and dated market evidence combined with a fresh account, positions and open orders snapshot. Each evaluation has observation timestamps.
JEV · SCORE
0
Question 3 · risk
YOUR APP
INSTRUCTION
Does the proposal or account snapshot reveal a material risk concern or missing required input?
STATE
User-provided futures proposal and dated market evidence combined with a fresh account, positions and open orders snapshot. Each evaluation has observation timestamps.
JEV · NOUL
YesNo
App workflow
- Configure account and strategy
The user connects a simulated contest account, selects contracts, and sets constraints and execution mode.
- Collect evidence
The host obtains market observations and a fresh account, position, and open-order snapshot.
- Evaluate proposal
Jev assesses evidence sufficiency, support, and risk against the supplied constraints.
- Review and act
The user reviews a plan or uses the configured execution path; submitted orders and fills are tracked separately.
- Monitor
When the JEV monitor is enabled, the workbench repeats observation and evaluation during its active run; the precise cadence is not established in this draft.
Why it is interesting
The explicit evidence-quality and risk questions separate “can evaluate this?” from “does evidence support the proposal?”, while the host retains execution control and records order acknowledgments separately from fills.