Small decisions. Interesting possibilities.Submit contentSubmit

pijev

pijev sends the same ticket state with several typed Choice questions that vary only the order of the same support-team criteria.

Added to Jevfast

How it uses Jev

pijev sends the same ticket state with several typed Choice questions that vary only the order of the same support-team criteria. It aligns returned probabilities by team, averages them, and returns the highest-mean team through the SDK-compatible response. The README documents both a two-order comparison (`forward`, `reverse`) and the pijev request (`team`); the shown option IDs are `billing`, `technical`, and `account`.

What Jev decides

Illustrative support-team permutation requestExample answers · not a recorded Jev response · Source ↗
Question 1 · team
YOUR APP
INSTRUCTION

Choose the best primary support team for the ticket.

STATE

A support ticket says a recent plan upgrade was paid, but dashboard access still reports the subscription as inactive.

JEV · CHOICE
  1. billing
  2. technical
  3. account

App workflow

  1. Build the request

    The caller supplies a ticket state and typed Choice criteria through the familiar TypeSafe client interface.

  2. Expand and evaluate

    pijev creates a balanced set of option orderings and asks them together in one System One request.

  3. Aggregate the result

    It aligns probabilities by option, averages them, and returns the original question name with the aggregated answer.

Why it is interesting

It treats option-order sensitivity as a nuisance variable and averages across permutations in one request. Its guarantee is about convex scoring loss versus a random included prediction, not an unconditional calibration or accuracy guarantee.