Small decisions. Interesting possibilities.Submit contentSubmit

How it uses Jev

The plugin sends numbered source snippets as state. For each matched lint rule it asks a Noul question about whether the snippet violates that rule. When the rule has location guidance and the snippet can be located, it also asks a Choice question to select a source line or range, with an `unknown` option. The caller validates returned answers before using them as verdicts and annotations.

What Jev decides

Illustrative violation check for one matched snippetExample answers · not a recorded Jev response · Source ↗
Question 1 · s0
YOUR APP
INSTRUCTION

Decide whether the rule is violated by the numbered snippet.

STATE

One source snippet is stored under `state.snippets.s0`; its source text and rule are supplied by the current match.

JEV · NOUL
YesNo

App workflow

  1. Prepare snippets

    Matched source snippets are placed in state under stable request-local references such as `s0`.

  2. Ask typed questions

    The request builder creates one Noul violation question per match and, when a source location is available, one Choice location question.

  3. Validate and report

    The response parser checks the answer type and probability; the location answer must match one of the request's criteria before it can be used.

Why it is interesting

It combines a yes/no violation decision with a second, evidence-localized decision, while reserving an explicit unknown location for uncertain annotations.